WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown)

To: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown)
From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:33:16 -0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:35:16 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=t8lH5uFbwUrNQzDb4OGkBjS1tk+g6dpOCYyS/HI+EcE=; b=nCiaXyLZC0YRoX1vmHHOFXO6voEMh6OhudqfQUBtzupsOc/jgrD9g/SvEmmfKAOy2W m4u6vgqF3YrlcfDU6oLj5nu7xCH+J6i+MD4YsrdiDB55oOfHtpkiK7dQ+DX6KMwd1wHo pgu6UPnNdT0u89clbsu09AsmdoVHOFuKQSP0o=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EA6CB8B.2020709@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAK5Eu=uRLu17+FTBZdqSUgbKUo4p1QHj1YFBWhy0f5F7Xb_9sg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <602C5EB92F9AFB4D89D11B9F5B7F1355160FF2F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAK5Eu=uH8xG52nRJVO7MaBH9sjzzMRNNQVX0Wc4bCHORj9BqPQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EA6CB8B.2020709@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NEVER upgrade XCP by CentOS packages.

You will break it beyond repair level. Reason is simple: XCP shipped with patched packages, and replacing them with non-patched will cause grave damage. And worst is damage is not instant - you will continue to operate, but found 'something got wrong' later.

The most important is lvm2 package, which is patched to allow shared storage usage (--master option). Default LVM2 will trash metadata on LVM SR (LVM and LVMoISCSI SM) at some moment.

Other (i'm not sure) is udev package, and may be few more.


Why aren't those packages masked in the repo configs like the kernel is?

Having a server OS with no upgrade path is a very bad idea. Zero day exploit? How about zero month or zero year exploit? I'd like to hope that this gets changed at some point.


Grant McWilliams
http://grantmcwilliams.com/

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users