WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] XEN - networking and performance

To: Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] XEN - networking and performance
From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:40:17 -0700
Cc: Simon Hobson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:42:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=U+8alclRjLFVPdn8s379qWOdTYVttKg2HrhxbtCqXyM=; b=UXxm8DEHmWl72HHGfR39CZyHKJWh/2lTwD5RHKzCcCXnpGvOIWhXtJhJmZyaZa2K7H YdYMdPO1FyWM+qwNs5QYSmOuQYq9V309cvwLZ/iFcNj/mV2evJTXrD+hRa4Y0B8092Jn Au2Gpnuv7iD/lnvjxyXBkXb0RDRiudsk9bQig=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B1B9801C5CBC954680D0374CC4EEABA50BE227D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAHsh07tm73Mb5VA6ye3uiwOVnhswbm-YUda=Ac139iOueavQMg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6A7C506116BA4B5A99FA3766341F1ED1@maindesk> <B1B9801C5CBC954680D0374CC4EEABA50BE0C5A9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p0624081bcab3c4d141f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B1B9801C5CBC954680D0374CC4EEABA50BE227D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon Hobson
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 4:51 PM
>
> Jeff Sturm wrote:
>
> >One of the traps we've run into when virtualizing moderately I/O-heavy
> >hosts, is not sizing our disk arrays right.  Not in terms of capacity
> >(terabytes) but in spindles.  If each physical host normally has 4
> >dedicated disks, for example, virtualizing 8 of these onto a domU
> >attached to a disk array with 16 drives effectively cuts that ratio
> >from 4:1 down to 2:1.  Latency goes up, throughput goes down.
>
> Not only that, but you also guarantee that the I/O is across different areas of the disk
> (different partitions/logical volumes) and so you also virtually guarantee a lot more
> seek activity.

Very true, yes.  In such an environment, sequential disk performance means very little.  You need good random I/O throughput and that's hard to get with mechanical disks, beyond a few thousand iops.  15k disks help, a larger chassis with more disks helps, but that's just throwing $$$ at the problem and doesn't really break through the iops barrier.

Anyone tried SSD with good results?  I'm sure capacity requirements can make it cost-prohibitive for many.

Jeff


I'm running  3/4 TB of SSDs for my additional disks in my XCP cloud shared out as an iSCSI SR. I tried SSDs as storage for disk images under Xen and there were some strange issues so I'm not quite ready to put OS images of the VMs on it. I'll report back when I have more info.

Grant McWilliams
http://grantmcwilliams.com/

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users