|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26)
2011/10/1 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote:
>> 2011/9/30 Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx>:
>> > Let me know, which date you agreed on. We could do a poll.
>> > We should publish on the blog a bit before.
>> > Also, how can I help?
>>
>> One thing where you could probably help best is setting clear rules
>> what do document for a release.
>> i.e. the 4.0 relnotes had build instructions and a lot more, whereas
>> this is missing in the next release note.
>>
>> either the build instructions were in the wrong place for 4.0 or 4.1
>> was released with incomplete info ;)
>> making a checklist sounds *ahem* in place :)
>>
>
> Xen 4.1 releasenotes do state that "check Xen 4.0 releasenotes for build
> instructions and more info" :)
You see how well that worked for me :)
Imagine a magazine which has half of the standard topics missing on
it's second issue with a pointer to the last one.
And tbh I guess if anyone had re-tested the 4.0 build instructions
line by line and found them 100% working then he'd probably have
copied them over?
Flo
--
the purpose of libvirt is to provide an abstraction layer hiding all
xen features added since 2006 until they were finally understood and
copied by the kvm devs.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26),
Florian Heigl <=
|
|
|
|
|