WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] preferred XEN dom0 OS

To: rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] preferred XEN dom0 OS
From: Christian Motschke <christian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:56:25 +0200
Cc: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>, Carsten Heesch <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 04:59:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <sig.5230c989c2.CAAj3DjmDBnjuyDED+-d0m_Opxu=jQJ11BhYa+BYHNMryA+Y1GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1314134830921-4728337.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240831ca7a50f669b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.92175ce0a7.CAAj3Djn=uCJP8_YKx=dgUd4QD6rTHW0PSAa6_xTx9BD8iRGqdw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAGnmK4xa3wzfdL=z0h-KF5QQwmghzh4sRYta_cDCQB2bsUWsoQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.421767fb10.CAAj3DjkB9OF5Wvcm+Prw_GdSHtz0GOtoMh5D1NAwx9GvPP4O2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAj3DjkB9OF5Wvcm+Prw_GdSHtz0GOtoMh5D1NAwx9GvPP4O2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAG1y0seCk8-08gv4Ej9zH1rGT6S_A+5+SYrtRAVLCPx-RVz5FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.92174f525d.CAAj3Djn0BfT3f1tjx1q6KbkeKhX0S_e9HcR_+V+Vt5PK80QF5Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAG1y0sd5ykdz5AhGLD=P1t07JmvdXp2pzmzKRtaKP8JHLTu=yw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAGnmK4zBCS0qMsARD5P6zacUfnDUs3nUF0G7111Syrp7gz-ZUA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.022339e502.CAAj3Djnu68H0oi56KE5=mTNBsUFNQiVyBsPeWEOcB_70Bw2AsA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAj3Djnu68H0oi56KE5=mTNBsUFNQiVyBsPeWEOcB_70Bw2AsA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CED700F6-0C5F-4AE3-9886-DD555D329764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.5230c989c2.CAAj3DjmDBnjuyDED+-d0m_Opxu=jQJ11BhYa+BYHNMryA+Y1GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I use XEN 4.x in production since years. I never had any problems with it. But 
on the other side Debian and XEN is not bleeding edge. But it is well tested 
and works out of the box (at least for me). At the moment I use it on 4 servers 
and a 5th as test system. I use a self compiled and patched 3.0 Debian kernel 
(I use the kernel source package from Debian unstable) because I need support 
for SCST in the kernel.

HTH
Christian

Am 06.09.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Rudi Ahlers:

> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Carsten Heesch <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Rudi,
>> 
>>> Does anyone use XEN with Scientific Linux?
>>> 
>>> What version do you run, and what's your experiences with it so far?
>> 
>> 
>> Running four Scientific Linux 6.1 boxes in a heavy testing environment here, 
>> with
>> Xen 4.1.1, and kernel from M A Young 
>> (http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/testing/x86_64/), because his kernels 
>> are by far closest to RedHat's specs.
>> 
>> Works very well. No problems so far. (Scientific Linux is essentially just 
>> another RHEL-clone, which gives you the option to install extra bits, but by 
>> default doesn't do so.)
>> 
>> As guest OS, I'm running CentOS 5.6 (PV), Scientific 6.1 (PV), FreeBSD (both 
>> HVM and PV).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Carsten
>> 
> 
> 
> I couldn't find anything on the net about M A Young, other than people
> on the list recommending his kernels, so I don't know how trustworthy
> it is.
> 
> 
> CentOS 6 + XEN was a total mess and the CentOS crowd are very hostile
> towards supporting that combination.
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone use XEN 4.x on Debian, in production?
> how well does it work?
> 
> 
> 
> OR, is XEN busy dying a slow death and I should rather look @ VMWare or KVM?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kind Regards
> Rudi Ahlers
> SoftDux
> 
> Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
> Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
> Office: 087 805 9573
> Cell: 082 554 7532
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>