WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] (no subject)

To: Benjamin Weaver <benjamin.weaver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] (no subject)
From: "Antonio Pina (antonio.pina)" <antonio.pina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:09:30 -0300
Accept-language: pt-BR
Acceptlanguage: pt-BR
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:11:46 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <148A0BB17CC8694A9899BDF3C1DE6DE930EEF4B1EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <148A0BB17CC8694A9899BDF3C1DE6DE930EEF4B1EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AQHMXXB3Wk3tEJT3VEa0Rs/iPaumRJUjXkaQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] (no subject)

We’ve seen the same behavior (random reboots) using ISCSI+OCFS2+XEN4

 

Regards.

 

 

From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benjamin Weaver
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 3:32 AM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] (no subject)

 

Debian box running virtual machines blows up under large NFS network load



[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]

I am running Debian Squeeze with Xen 4.0. I am running a stress test. I have created 2 virtual machines, each with 512 Mb of memory adn 8Gb in size. I have made one of the vms an NFS server, sharing out a large file (4.6 Gb). The other virtual machine is an NFS client. The stress test consists of passing that big file back and forth via an mv command executed on the client, which moves the file back and forth from the nfs share directory to a local directory. The virtual machines are stored on a remote SAN connected to by ISCSI and formatted in ocfs2.

It is true I have had better luck with some ethernet cards than others.

One of the boxes, running Intel 1000Mb cards (1 to the SAN/OCFS2, 1 to the outside world), runs the vms and the stress test without problems.

 

But the other box, running a 1000Mb Realtek nic to the outside

world and a 100Mb Realtek nic to the SAN, fails. The

100Mb nic was dropping packets to the SAN so I changed

the SAN nic to the Realtek 1000Mb

 

Now I do not drop packets (aside from a handful on the 2 vif interfaces at startup)


And yet,

about 1 out of 2 times I attempt to mv the file from the local directory of the nfs client vm to the nfs share, the box running the vms reboots. It leaves no logs, and seldom even any messages on the screen. It just blanks out and the next thing I know I it is rebooting.

I have tried manipulating the size of the MTU, with out positive success.

I have noticed that all--or nearly all--the reboots occur when I attempt to mv the file BACK INTO the nfs shared directory.

I begun testing with tcpdump, and notice that a large number of packets go over with checksums correct, then, after a packet of unusually long length, all show checksums incorrect.  (but I am new to tcpdump and may not be interpreting the output correctly).


Any ideas why the host machine is rebooting, and how this could be fixed? Could changing the size of the ring buffer make a difference? I read about this on a couple of web pages.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>