|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 4.0 - prerequisites for succesfull live migration?
I know this bug:
if vcpu_max > vcpu_online migration of SUSE fails badly. Confirmed with
2.6.34, 2.6.37 and XCP (xen 3.4) multiple times.
On 08.07.2011 16:15, Danilo Godec wrote:
On 07/07/2011 11:32 AM, Mark Dokter wrote:
I had migration and save/restore issues with xen 4.0 on debian and
ubuntu. (See thread "Live migration on xen 4.0.1 fails" on this list
(dated 04/2011). I did not really find out, what went wrong. Now I
use xen 4.1 and migration works (with 2.6.38+ pv-on-hvm domUs).
Thanks, I'll try to setup a lab to test 4.1...
But in the mean time I made some discoveries:
I'm using the 'vcpus=X' and 'vcpu_avail='Y' to start my VM's with 'Y'
VCPU's, but still be able to add some VCPU's later if needed (where X
is the number of cores in my biggest server and Y is typically 2).
In this case, live migration fails.
If I omit the 'vcpu_avail' option and only use 'vcpus=Y', live
migration seems to work. However 'xm console' doesn't work after
migration and
'xm shutdown' doesn't work either - instead the CPU usage according
to xentop shoots up to 100% and ultimately the DomU has to be destroyed.
Danilo
PS: I'm using para-virtualisation. Would I be better off using HVM?
So this is the first problem. I wonder if there is a known problem
with this specific Xen version or something specific to your setup on
OpenSUSE?
I've added the opensuse-virtual list to the CC just in case someone
can shed some light on it. (here is this message in context
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2011-07/msg00090.html)
Thanks,
Todd
regards,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|