| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Who is better .
Le 02/07/2011 00:29, Simon Hobson a écrit :
admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
It depends which guest OS you plan to run
the most. For example, Linux runs as a guest under both Xen and
Hyper-V. However, Linux guests run quite poorly under Hyper-V.
If you plan to run a lot of Linux guests, I would definitely
encourage you to use Xen instead of Hyper-V. If all of the
guests will be Windows based, Hyper-V can be an excellent
solution, though.
I'd concur with that. We use both at work, I use Xen for the Linux
stuff, my manager uses Hyper-V for the Windows stuff. Hyper-V has
the advantage for many that it has a nice GUI and you can randomly
click options to configure it !
Wow! random clicking that make things works! Great!
Who needs a brain :)
When I hear what they are loading the machines up
with, I get the impression that Hyper-V is a tad hungry - but that
could just be that Windows tends to be quite hungry while my Linux
boxes are generally fairly lean and doing different tasks.
One major difference is that with Xen and appropriate guests (eg
Linux guests that run as PV), you don't need hardware
virtualisation support. That's how I got three of my servers -
cast offs that can't run Hyper-V because of the lack of that.
Mind you, I'll probably be firing up a Linux guest under Hyper-V
shortly. This will be to go onsite at a customer where they
already have Hyper-V running.
--
|
a_chapellon.vcf
Description: Vcard
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home