 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Disk Usages
| To: | Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Disk Usages |
| From: | Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:14:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:20:38 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D21mB82OMDUewF0RO+JRKvHCcv7dEifU/NOVL9PkjCE=; b=Js6Py09Kpo+ZlVk5OOfO7M07dERdc4dAJCoF505S7/BdkSf6DzDrHemCcCQrV1dbcs PONjcCJkulCnHiR+VlhIUiRW55W9miAa+ijVu2guSkt3X+hDTZLu/MyoD+xd9ppLA4zy opI0xY/ytkt24Pt1ah5HRe5tgECennq7ZLKj4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Snfd7CmXTKyOZm1W+LAcll5IMzU91rex9//JTuRUs7VsDm7xDyjL4TQGwYXTLWiR8u HcIOGBd2hs4kSPwpluopzAACIIOdNQ1M8JyeP6ZydnuTTXF7fm0Ziw31STI2t/NQeGnO JghT1neIZFfL2Cz8C4HySRVBzClVFXWsFdUJ4= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4DFA3077.2070500@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4DFA3077.2070500@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, > I am aware that I can throttle a DomU's disk usage by using ionice in the > Dom0 against the correct blkback process. However, how does one actually > find out what the "offending" DomU is? if it's enough to find out "after" the fact - meaning, when there already IS excessive disk IO, then iotop is the very best thing since sliced bread. imho even better than top :) Can you also give https://bitbucket.org/darkfader/black-magic/src/d14a84157990/usr/local/bin/blksched a test run in this situation and let me know if it helps for you? Florian -- the purpose of libvirt is to provide an abstraction layer hiding all xen features added since 2006 until they were finally understood and copied by the kvm devs. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] How to access the VM, after it had been started without SSH or VNC., Rafael Weingartner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Disk Usages, Jonathan Tripathy |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Disk Usages, Jonathan Tripathy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Disk Usages, Jonathan Tripathy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
