 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] XCP and linux-3.0rc2
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] XCP and linux-3.0rc2 |
| From: | George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:19:00 +0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:18:32 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tnMdaEd07CW4HKR7rFcpHqy+DeCCUE/NedtioUcpEJc=; b=wAuTLKo4p9vFshEEIVJqkRRz4rqDLWjQDF5qK/o/rNY0yHPWBRekXmKuK7tfp8841V kTFRokll0qMinkBJm1y6LcwQR69IMQZ54e8Yfmi+10ZaZgWtxU7i4HYs37548U/eeBA3 kkTrNjaEcxhU6T8YY7sZx/LOMOpBI9rWCt4Lw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OoB0g4dEY+DZ/Ce/US921Ns42ZpaPcdPw4zXqTKtyn0qy2teM+uFcojZJf78HuPfFY fFFpGdPEQwNE6dSVsS9M2EDgECWvz4AFMdZbwWVvImGBnRaR9RKT9hqsWZ7hESDNXzO+ 41yB4UIGSuscBNjVmmSttUVLIw5R/qAKFGakk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110606 Icedove/3.1.10 |
Good day.Found strange behavior for fresh-compiled kernel 3.2rc2: After boot machine does not reply to network activity until any traffic going out from VM (e.g. ping to any host). Same problem occur after vm migration. As far as I remember this called 'grace arp' which one shall be send by guest kernel. Last time I met this problem about year ago and I solve it by using *-xen kernels. How right now things with vanilla kernel (as PV-guest) and grace arp are? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] expanding Xen guest disk size, Fajar A. Nugraha |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Can we use PXE to run XEN LiveCD, Chee-Yang Chau |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] When should I use '-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs' ?, Pandu Poluan |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] Can we use PXE to run XEN LiveCD, Chee-Yang Chau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
