 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Bad TCP accept performance
| To: | Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Bad TCP accept performance |
| From: | Carl Byström <cgbystrom@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2011 09:51:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 25 May 2011 00:53:23 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=19TIGHDx/lv24MNU8wgL2M8sQc4UEDDN54K5MUU4OBw=; b=KEo74vPnwVfA3i0YcRQAsumrFEoDEXiu/m4E5xi9wfEZ55xCx24e8tjF4wgCV70Vg6 4EgPsQo5P8mr/dezfN5DxXFxecClHaan1Xu9moMAi2ZRVo06qE/Montw4WQ9HD4fFw0s J8m6rysIlUsru/Z3GAQ5MNC3ONZl4SUOEtEjk= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HgbapzQfrzap3O225wH6Ubb4kE6cxWVn0epyJrPnZ+LavXfBX8KZqoiD36zI5weSy0 lFEBUsDH7h4mo68uaAeF7vI7XaW9fJYQ2ZAygpwbtadIpknTz0AFDInOaeGG1OsmHVR8 b4qCoq/LZYwZbhH0dhbab7yY6Jlo8vMaoKH6A= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110525055436.GG32595@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <BANLkTimRM22jKtC6Qrv_PsDo-3LbSMtarQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110523202257.GD32595@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTim68TbZLrCVZcK8VWQxErYHkC56vA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110525055436.GG32595@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
I've tried it on EC2, but not on our private servers yet. Made no difference there.
Someone has also suggested that increasing the backlog (well beyond 128) could help improve things. tcp_syncookies was another suggestion. I have no idea what they will do, haven't tried them yet.
Also got a report (see the previous link posted) from someone on KVM with a lot better performance. Whether those were correctly performed, I cannot tell but at least interesting if that's the case.
-- Carl Byström _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Fwd: (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM........................ Reboot, Christian Motschke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Re: PCI e Passthrough, Mike Fröhner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Bad TCP accept performance, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Bad TCP accept performance, Iain Kay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
