Re: [Xen-users] HVM vs PV (Xen Full virtualization (HVM) XenPara

To:	James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] HVM vs PV (Xen Full virtualization (HVM) XenParavirtualization (PV))
From:	Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:18 -0300
Cc:	nemus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 17:43:46 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=j2MajyphXYiaEf4xGb9Ss1lAVSRfsd9PPVgruft6vy8=; b=pW+ynjUR8yV9hyp94c2hec1oh7BItSxQQLoQWbkBVzLC1CbObbFbaWlXCB3cUqI6Yt 5palJcUGc0qD/ZofCOL5hqtdvEG/pDYoshlw8Aw36lvmmPGZ3RSF1mxHqfRS1bPEJvC1 ZJVAZ9ll9uUBiDRw/OQUukEodHV+L533TdJVU=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=G27Z7Kb7YGnC7mOnrhpRslUgK9vMYpuKDEfGj2P8WpRMHVwyJMxXyebTGthDsbqVM+ L2bfyPjMKRFY5j8axQGHv+VDwhiCYObE+cOfLxjS6NbnYRsOidoRqrZBWqgj9Fu7nKqO 0ODvvz/i6qY3JgBHmhmZ8cdQ7V7w5vAI3CumE=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01D571DB@trantor>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<006f668db8541d3e6d248157550cdd9b.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTimxQJJoMjVNrMkhdjZb4vhD=BqFSw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01D571DB@trantor>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You right!!! I forgot this details... Maybe that is because I never used Windows LOL

So, I never needed the HVM domains...

Thiago

2011/5/18 James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Windows does not work as a PVM domain.
>

That's correct, but it is possible (and desirable) to load drivers into Windows that use the PV communications channelto talk to the disk/network/etc in Dom0 instead of the emulated qemu PCI devices. This is true under HVM Linux too. HVM also has some other benefits too.

(you would know this obviously, but I just thought I'd add it for the OP's benefit :)

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] HVM vs PV (Xen Full virtualization (HVM) XenParavirtuali