 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.
| To: | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in. |
| From: | Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 May 2011 12:32:48 +0800 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 14 May 2011 21:34:13 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=postfix; bh=CumtiYBm/ GyM7YjnnpSq2avY2pk=; b=jCZindoMmDahZH/tzoarDoXVJqHaUymSGdj7KvJLf 66oL9Qx8kojw5EMS0SpDSiGmvOeXbNk9v/AFCdDMp/Eh8OJvyo0L4KRF3Ca0nz5j aT3s+vWIi/UX09YnVJSNTPp8AJYXX0K5r7CNk6scyIz4esGb3n9EuALrHOKabKl5 uw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b=Kct MFdI42w39ll0+fYmpw/1SCylheJ/16nURd7WaPumH/+vOZ/7iq1kFjSEq4JCY+70 /UqfGxEHcK7skc0zMpaTt2GXz2L5Co9Wl2MKhyGsxxKPsdISDIGYL7dDrKdxJm+e Dv8OFMvJ93TyKdYq5QSu8jlP4yUJe3QEDV7PbMaQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110514150225.GA31761@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | GPLHost |
| References: | <20110513143615.GA16193@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTim_hgQ2qPWr9aZ8OtTrurz4LqA=jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110513164927.GA18484@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DCE4C45.8080706@xxxxxxxxxx> <20110514150225.GA31761@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110505 Icedove/3.0.11 |
On 05/14/2011 11:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:32:53PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 12:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> >>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major >>>> milestone to be pushed upstream? >>>> >>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is >>> important >>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one. >>> >> >> Thanks a lot Konrad, for the report. >> >> Can you tell what the problem was with of xen-blkback.c? > > Not sure I understand you. Then xen block backend (so > drivers/block/xen-blkback/*) > is going through review on LKML? Sorry, let me rephrase: why has drivers/block/xen-blkback.c not been upstreamed to kernel.org yet? What was the blocker(s)? LKLM is a very busy list, hard to follow... Thomas _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] XCP - Reclaim diskspace from snapshots on xcp 1.0, Denis Cardon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] PV networking issue in 2.6.38.6 and 2.6.39-rc7, Mario |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in., Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
