 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] XCP: high availability options
| To: | Phillip Farthing <pfarthing@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] XCP: high availability options |
| From: | Dustin Marquess <dmarquess@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:13:47 -0700 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:15:13 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wwYFvIbnEiR15cxNOI0MZ34F7cq6ccdgY5crY3nqrko=; b=m8CTwnjHS8/164npXZVL8pc9ShJyrMQzET9hXNwFPSphQPNOEQSCNezrQazPLNuVt+ 7BEwHMq+YtiVNpQHE33vRhsHUYbfD99M3uYJ9x5XaXgGwxw6FE7pE79WZ11fmyoQQQ62 RBJbiYQnJGZ1wY+G16qdBlAVSQT/ib+QRckF8= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hcpc2LTXt0uUtnu5FgWXuZj4YNZFAvDOv6WaIMM069NuMqO9EXlOP0l3nGuYb+eVAL JLN4hgwvARtLOgsCHjrc9TA+MH7xR+cfpAx9NrRRSpvClWqBucCEhQNv6Bb9Tmlp3reR MfqrYgOb2cjc8hSBIPaM6P3U+8ndh8dVo7HW0= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <SNT117-W417D9368053C606891738EB69B0@xxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <SNT117-W417D9368053C606891738EB69B0@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
The API is there, the solution as a whole is just not supplied. I believe that piece of XenServer was not open sourced. I know XCCS adds balancing, I'm not sure about HA. -Dustin On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Phillip Farthing <pfarthing@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Xen.org website says that there is not high availabiity options in XCP. > And by HA, I mean, if a host node fails, that the vm was start on another > available host. But also migration for work load balancing would be great > too. > > Is this true? There is no HA available? If so, what are the alternatives? If > HA is available, can somepone point me to the docs or settings to configure > this? > > thanks! > > P > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] Failing to provision a VM when vif MTU > 1500 with patches applied, Digimer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Issues migrating to xen 4.1 / lvm vg for disk, Sylvain CHEVALIER |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] XCP: high availability options, Phillip Farthing |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] XCP: high availability options, riki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
