When is XCP going to update their page for the road map, I'm curios when the
hope to have the next update out if they are going to try and make some sort of
regular release cycle and what they are working on for the next update?
Corey Hemminger
SCSU - BCRL/HPCG
Systems/Networking
Administrator
________________________________________
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
xen-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [xen-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:02 PM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Xen-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 39
Send Xen-users mailing list submissions to
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
xen-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
xen-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Xen-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Xen-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 38 (????? ?????????)
2. Re: Shared Storage (Javier Guerra Giraldez)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:29:11 +0300
From: ????? ????????? <aemon@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Xen-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 38
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <BANLkTikPbfYk1GdTor4zMViFFazQN37-hA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi all!
In release for last XCP (1.0.0) I've read that developers made caching
mechanism more efficient (caching VDI from network storage to local
storage). After this I have 2 questions:
1. How can I control it and measure it's efficient?
2. How this mechanism works? Does it cache full VDI? Or it caches the
most useful part of VDI p.e. running OS and its own cache?
I've read presentation for caching in XCP, but there were no
information about mechanism.
Best regards, Den.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:53:34 -0500
From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage
To: John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Harper
<james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Tripathy
<jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Dye <jdye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <BANLkTimqVO=p5pyoF+RBvyN9vJEvp-70ew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:03 PM, John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> so your 1gbit pipe ends up being, you know, .8gbit storage and .2gbit
> protocol (I don't know what the exact numbers are)
more like .96gbit storage and .04gbit protocol.... or .993/.007 on jumbo frames
--
Javier
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
End of Xen-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 39
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home