| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] status of remus
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
There's a new and active maintainer for Remus. He's been posting
many patches recently to xen-devel mailinglist.
Good to hear!
Just remember Remus is FT (Fault Tolerance) solution..
often it's better use software/service based HA instead of vm-based FT.
FT is way slower than "normal" HA.
Can you elaborate a bit, both re. what you see as the difference between
fault tolerance vs. HA, and re. speed?
Currently, I'm running a collection of services on a single VM, with
DRBD/heartbeat/pacemaker failover to a 2nd node. Failover takes a LONG
time. Looks to me like Remus should provide instant failover.
Thanks,
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In<fnord> practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home