WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.

To: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
From: John McMonagle <johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:13:39 -0600
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:14:40 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01C55BD7@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201103031659.33950.johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01C55BD7@trantor>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-686; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; )
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 05:57:21 pm you wrote:
> > This concerns an old problem
> 
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-08/msg00567.html
> 
> > Still having the problem with network performance but need to really
> 
> fix it.
> 
> > Just did a test with 32 bit xp with 0.11.0.238 drive.
> > it show device as Xen Net device driver.
> > 
> > Iperf gives 14.7 Mbits/sec
> > 
> > Running an xp live boot cd  get 13.6 Mbits/sec
> > Doesn't looks like the the pv driver is doing anything to help the
> 
> network as
> 
> > there is probably extra load with no pv drivers for disk and display.
> > 
> > How much of a speed improvement are others seeing?
> > 
> > The real issue is speed for samba shares.
> > 
> > I have tried on other hardware and it's a bit faster but not that
> 
> impressive.
> 
> > To keep the speed in perspective this is /proc/cpuinfo
> 
> XP is probably a poor benchmark for GPLPV (or even without) for a few
> reasons. If you want to get decent performance out of XP, disable the
> firewall service (in services, not just in the network control panel)
> and append " /PATCHTPR" to the boot.ini entry if using GPLPV. The
> problem with XP is that it makes _very_ frequent calls to change and
> read the TPR (Task PRiority) register, which incurs quite a bit of
> overhead. "/PATCHTPR" avoids that completely on AMD hardware and
> optimises the read case on Intel hardware, although I think Intel under
> Xen may not suffer so badly these days.
> 
> I'm seeing a few gigabits per second when doing DomU<->Dom0 testing, and
> full hardware speeds when talking over a physical network adapter when I
> last tested.
> 
> James


Looks like I already had /PATCHTPR although in lower case. I changed to upper 
case.   Turning off the firewall helped a little. Now up to 17 Mbit/sec.
This is an older intel server may that be the issue?

I'll try the same on a amd server tomorrow.

I'm thinking of running server 2008 on this intel server, is that likely to 
work much better?

I have a couple windows applications that we must run that do not deal well 
with a multiuser environment.  I'd prefer to use xp but suppose could run 
windows7 if that will help but will need a lot of extra ram.

John

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users