On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>> - Processor type and features -> High Memory Support -> 64GB
>>> Yes selected this
>>>> - Processor type and features -> Paravirtualized guest support -> "Xen
>>>> guest support"
>>> No I did not get this option (I have no clue why)
>>
>> Did you download the correct kernel source? From JF's git tree, either
>> xen/stable-2.6.32.x or xen/next-2.6.32?
> Yes I did
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
> linux-2.6-xen
> cd linux-2.6-xen
> git pull
> git reset –hard
> git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable
> git pull
>
>> Did paravirtualized guest support option show up?
> Yes
> --- Paravirtualized guest support
> [*] VMI Guest support (DEPRECATED)
> [*] KVM paravirtualized clock
> [*] KVM Guest support
> [ ] Lguest guest support
> -*- Enable paravirtualization code
> [*] Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks
Two things come to mind.
One, you might be using a different branch than me.
origin/xen/stable-2.6.32.x should contain newer code than
origin/xen/stable (see
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=heads for
complete branch list). I haven't tested xen/stable, so I don't know
what condition it currently is.
Second, you might not select High Memory Support -> 64GB yet. By
default, 4GB is selected instead of 64GB, in which case Xen options
will be hidden (just like what you pasted).
Other than those two, I don't know what else can cause the difference.
--
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home