WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

from [Christian Zoffoli] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:18:03 +0100
Cc: yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:19:04 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1daff6e.e808.12dc3148556.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1daff6e.e808.12dc3148556.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110105 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 
Il 26/01/2011 17:07, yue ha scritto:
> yes, there has no a good silution.
> 1.san+gfs2(ocfs2)
> 2.san+clvm
> 3san+clvm+gfs2(ocfs2)
> 4san+normal filesystem, ext3.....
> which has the better performance?

4 if your SAN exports as many luns as your VM disks

2 is better IMHO ...more flexible, not so high overhead

Christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] RE: About: rm -f /bin /sh, J. Roeleveld
Previous by Thread:  Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy