WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] old issue after 1024 live migrations seems to still exis

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] old issue after 1024 live migrations seems to still exist.
From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:52:35 +0400
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:54:24 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NUpbcpRUzEnmxEb6uAkW2tW+dINjxmflj0YQQdgCYaQ=; b=bUQ4UBrzOF5jmuaSEJbzS6xpVgvo6SpYCkEnxlEfYoj+ImhRIIZPgmUFp8F6bWqNfg 6gpMkcBlwcp3dPNzUfnzXFFXl+FmM6mo+Ev1Q8lFKJGgyR/d7+PRJo3OZ9+CkQaTe6p6 FeT6KoNl32exijInElnFULcOOh2cs9p+8b1pw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=hU6I+BY3HV4aUjTdGvUXHhNJ16AVRjlq1vVSCpOG0Gd7fdAR2tScxDMgduL09ukmOB vLo8rB/cesoaYMyO/KuitWAv1aop7WcGhHSfMlJpN/gcckzQ872TotHwmX2ucve2oWpu OGpSLrugAaU3j57Kyyyt8UFKgqOVD6TlirHpU=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTin9tPJhFjN5p1nF7AyNTqHrcQy8Tmzut2vcMPQ5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTikWKjU2MS7Daip5z2WTSZwNYFDd9_eqZRKGdi7k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin9tPJhFjN5p1nF7AyNTqHrcQy8Tmzut2vcMPQ5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I put vm to endless migration loop (migration, 10s sleep, migration)
between 3 hosts. Tomorrow I'll see what happens.

В Срд, 21/07/2010 в 12:25 -0400, Boris Quiroz пишет:
> 2010/7/21 Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > last month I did some checkig of old Xen issues that I remember and
> > found this one to still exist - if you do a high amount of live
> > migrations at some point the xen daemon chokes and dies.
> > The issue was reported by someone on the list like 4-5 years ago, but
> > it seems it hasn't been fixed (not sure if anyone even replied back
> > then)
> > The Xen version I used to test as 3.4.0 from Oracle VM 2.2
> >
> > Basically You just ping-pong one domU and somewhere after 900
> > migrations you first see it drop the ball a few times (vm needs to be
> > restarted) and then about 100 times later one one of the hosts the xen
> > daemon will crash, restart and not be able to boot vm's any more.
> >
> > (I waited a while to post this, but about time now I get it done)
> > I'm building some power management magic witrh loadbalancing so that
> > idle servers can automatically shutdown and startup, and cpu intensive
> > vm's can be distributed evenly.That this bug still exists is a
> > nightmare: 1024 migrations sounds a lot, but with 128 VMs on a host it
> > just equals just 4 migrations per VM, right? Without the loadbalancing
> > bit this wouldn't have to happen very often, but I think it's a key
> > feature.
> > If the RDMA live migration ever comes around, there'd be nothing against 
> > it...
> >
> > I've also prepared a clumsy script for the test, which can be found here:
> >
> > http://wartungsfenster.pastebin.org/410803
> >
> > I can open a bug report but i think it'd be best if someone re-test on
> > Xen4 first.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Florian
> >
> > p.s.:
> > why is live migration so slow (2-3 seconds)  - without sdp i had 2-3
> > gbit of bandwidth, the vm was 64MB size  (that means 1/6 second of
> > transfer for the main bulk) and idle without networking!
> > is it just the gratious arp?
> >
> > --
> > 'Sie brauchen sich um Ihre Zukunft keine Gedanken zu machen'
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
> 
> Creepy..
> If this bug is still unsolved, could be XCP buggy too? Can anybody
> test it? At work I don't have any testing environment =(
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users