Re: [Xen-users] Do systems have to be IDENTICAL for live migrati

> 
> Hi Nick. I actually had all of this in the original post, but cut it
in
> replies. See below.
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> The first system is a ProLiant DL360 G6:

Sorry I missed the OP.  Could you post the actual model number of the
processors?  For example, Intel Xeon X3540?    The info you have there
is good, but still doesn't give much information about possible
architecture differences between the two.

-Nick


--------
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use 
of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are 
not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, 
please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) 
Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly 
prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this 
message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this message 
that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor 
attributable to SEAKR.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-users] [XCP] Strange bug this avaible memory for guests, George Shuklin

Next by Date:

R: [Xen-users] XCP 0.5 release upgrade, oddity, cluster

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Do systems have to be IDENTICAL for live migration?, James Pifer

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Do systems have to be IDENTICAL for live migration?, James Pifer

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]