WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array

To: "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Adi Kriegisch" <kriegisch@xxxxxxxx>, <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:58:17 +1000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:00:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0AFD26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100617073236.GC30903@xxxxxxxx><46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0620A1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D82360D633@ALTERNATEREALIT><46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0620A3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20100617100216.GG30903@xxxxxxxx><46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0620A7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20100617102120.GH30903@xxxxxxxx><46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0620AA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20100617105427.GJ30903@xxxxxxxx><46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0620AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20100617121905.GK30903@xxxxxxxx> <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F0AFD26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcsOF0+O4KBNUnBXReK7zKitVfCx4QAALKsIAAEleXA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array
> 
> Would it be of any benifit to create a "mode 4" bond and use 802.3ad
with ATA
> over Ethernet? Or would that be just a waste, when AoE can use the
interfaces
> directly?
> 

I could see it being useful if you didn't dedicate the interfaces to
AoE, eg you had some AoE targets and some iSCSI targets. I'm not sure
how AoE schedules packets though so maybe this isn't an issue.

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>