|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:20 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> > One option may be to consider Fedora as they appear to be working to add
> > Xen back in the next release:
> >
> > [1]http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
> >
> > There are also Oracle Linux and CentOS that may do something about
> > including Xen.
> >
>
> Oracle is actively developing Xen.. especially pvops dom0 kernel.
> And Oracle has their own Xen-based virtualization solution (Oracle VM).
>
> -- Pasi
If my math is right, Oracle now owns 3 Xen solutions - they had their
own xen based Oracle VM. Later they bought another Xen based solution -
Virtual Iron (bought whole company IIRC). And with Sun acquisition, they
also got the Sun xVM (Xen with Solaris Dom0 IIRC). So it would be kind
of strange, if they decided to lay off the Xen development and
products. :)
Regards
Matej
<<attachment: winmail.dat>> _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Steven Timm
- RE: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Jeff Sturm
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Steven Timm
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- RE: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Frank Pikelner
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen,
Matej Zary <=
- Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, John Haxby
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, John Haxby
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Florian Heigl
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
|
|
|
|
|