[Xen-users] Xen 4.0 - what solution?

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] Xen 4.0 - what solution?
From:	"For@ll" <forall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:14:43 +0200
Delivery-date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:17:03 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4

Hi,

I have 2 servers where one of them is master and there are working datebase and two virutal machines on it. When the master fails the other machine takes control

and two VM's are started. Database between these two servers will be synchronized by drbd.

How can I achieve it using xen, if remus (fault tolerance) will solve it?

For@ll

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] Xen 4.0 - what solution?