WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?
From: Fabiano Francesconi <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:44:57 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:46:28 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JPFNZkXVTI/EAqpTKNEydiP0zr/Z0OQbkf+OQmjB+vc=; b=Dy4QrdA5xJtnClwOF2bsl8I1Mlr6ltw/q/xeCGoICX9VsrTeW3QTKH+Fe3VHK604+Q 1txKskKUs9AhTnM26qmd2Gp3UIU13WiKuUKgHOedwR3b069dM5Rr60vQeFHWE3F/EaIE evGNN4+fzHjBmBq25T3ppqr+AlHge1Teg9mUw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=nsk3m/GpxqgGDA2XGF3ogjJ6ZXoQH8ytOwPgxHt3Y28c9oxS5gn+lvhW7DOrsSw/Kq fgXnORpAQM9EH9eRL8SgM0p3zvFihcCgwWxHdsrMsQpTGFEFUuhI9C2xTCUXOs0amUPs NaK+xJDz1mNOwtYrX1Jc7DbH7vuc62cY18e6g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <h2jf4527be1004110655g4d61faa9va243867256de8a0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20100411103057.GA3244@whitebox> <h2jf4527be1004110655g4d61faa9va243867256de8a0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:55:24PM +0100, Andrew Lyon wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Fabiano Francesconi
> <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello there,
> > I'm noticing a performance regression for what's matter the hard-disk I
> > pass to the domU (aquaria).
> 
> 
> Have you checked the performance of the disk in dom0?
> 
> >
> > The slow-down is very noticeable even when moving small videos file
> > (~350mb).
> >
> > In the configuration file of the domU, I pass the whole disk
> > ('phy:/dev/sdb,xvdb,w') to the guest OS.
> >
> > The distribution under both systems is Gentoo/Linux, x86 arch.
> >
> > The hypervisor is always the same, in both scenarios (Linux xevelon
> > 2.6.32-xen-r1 #1 SMP Sat Apr 10 13:37:02 CEST 2010 i686 Intel(R)
> > Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux).
> >
> > The machine is an Atom, so it's not capable of any VT technology but so
> > far it's a great machine and XEN is working just fine on it.
> >
> > I attach you few logs I've gathered.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > --
> > Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >

Ok, confirmed. The problem is only visible when copying files so it's
not something related to the hard-disk itself.

I sincerely don't know how to dig into this but I have made some tests
myself.

I've tried copying a single avi file (350mb) from one partition to
another one. Both partition are on the same device (WDC WD10EADS-00M2B0)
and both formatted in XFS filesystem.

Running 2.6.32-xen-r1 I have the following output:

real    1m35.001s
user    0m0.016s
sys     0m0.722s

Running 2.6.29-xen-r4 I have, instead, the following output:

real    0m20.689s
user    0m0.018s
sys     0m2.047s

How can I see such a difference? Is there some known regression for XFS
filesystem? I might try to run a vanilla kernel instead of a xen-patched
one.

Any suggestion will be very much appreciated.

-- 
Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461]

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users