Re: [Xen-users] Success Story: debian lenny 64bit, xen 4.0, pv_ops 2.6.31.13, VT-d

[chris <tknchris@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nope, just an old habit. I didn't realize it had changed. So iommu=1
should be enough by itself? I was also curious where it says vt-d for
pv guests disabled? You cant have it for both hvm and pv at the same
time?

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:28:51PM -0400, chris wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have seen quite a bit of posts regarding Xen 4.0 on debian/ubuntu. I
>> just wanted to report that my first Xen4 install went great. I am
>> running a ASUS Z8NA-D6 Dual LGA1366 Motherboard with two Xeon 5520's,
>> 24GB ram, software raid-1. Everything seems to be working very well
>> even VT-d which is surprising :) Below is some output of my first
>> successful boot:
>>
>
> Good to hear it works!
>
>> xm info
>> http://pastebin.com/6e5EG2Tv
>>
>> xm dmesg
>> http://pastebin.com/8vwhkkph
>>
>
> (XEN) Command line: vtd=1 iommu=1 dom0_mem=512M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all
>
> "vtd=1" is old/obsolete parameter, it's not used anymore.
> Also "iommu=1" is the default in Xen 4.0.0, so that's not needed either :)
>
> "iommu=verbose" can be used to get more debugging output,
> especially if IO virtualization doesn't get enabled.
>
>> dom0 dmesg
>> http://pastebin.com/RDDVYNgK
>>
>> I used the wiki page http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 as a
>> guide and everything went well.
>>
>
> Was vtd=1 mentioned somewhere there?
>
> -- Pasi
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users