Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] (Xenlinux) gentoo-xen-kernel pat

To:	Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] (Xenlinux) gentoo-xen-kernel patches questions?
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:24:02 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1270236166; bh=iEcGbN/sFdx1OnY9KVHVRMp316jNpHKw9teelMd5ysY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=d3Ic/j1ZzyJQF1rgUqX+VNfDzcC9SK/WGPOoMlgGoZYceHcj9rjLEU+57qpyls0UUdNmxEBnJm3vEcdqoPBv0QWFMqDAma31tAlAntcTY3QSH7wgBcElaDzhCLsLJtUiJZlUpuTNabl/KHT9PkKaJlsVXEOky7X97a6kQM2XIWE=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2HwSLjITkmChREPPeP9ddk9/zpjLAYK21WJBmksCSp2GHP805NORLjaWgXZDjy0hgF5ur4y0l9/jEG2Uf60X15CsuAR4XHLkQzBSv0Y1vGGAPibdx1LpozuKYeZVBlrfxyoW8gYLNCLMvGlq6MorbTyZjmHlcvrccEc/cwm5Iak=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20100402171509.GC9223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link referenced by you contains rebased patch set done by Andy Lyon
using an original forward porting xen patches for 2.6.31.8-xen ( on openSUSE 11.2) per Jan Beulich. Suse's src.rpm is a source to perform
Andy's patches. PVops kernels based on git branches developed by Jeremy, Konrad,Xia Zang, Yu Ke,.. may be loaded as vanilla kernel and under Xen
Hypervisor as well. It's different way of mind. Coming soon Xen 4.0 official
release (04/05/10) would have PVops kernel based on Jeremy Fitzhardinge Git Repo. I would guess 2.6.32.10. It seems running stable.

Boris.

--- On Fri, 4/2/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] (Xenlinux) gentoo-xen-kernel patches questions?
To: "Mike Viau" <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 1:15 PM

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:26:46PM -0400, Mike Viau wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the Xenlinux 2.6.33 patches are tagged as being "Deprecated" but the 2.6.31 are not.
>
> May I ask why?

No idea. But those patches are pursuing an entirely different method of
getting Linux to work in privileged state (Dom0). The current
development is with the pv-ops one:

http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] (Xenlinux) gentoo-xen-kernel patches que