|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] AoE vs iSCSI 
| On 3/18/2010 11:37 AM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
>     This is getting a bit off-topic for a Xen list, I'm afraid.
>     -Jeff
> I don't think so, this is very useful information for those of us about
> to roll out SANs to our Xen clouds.
> Grant McWilliams
  Obviously, I agree with Grant. I think SAN and Xen are two pieces of the 
whole puzzle.
Xen can reduce or remove your service availability's tie to a particular CPU, 
but by
itself cannot remove the tie to a particular piece of storage. SAN seems to the 
be the
best way to achieve that goal and achieve the reliability goal. Obviously most 
people are
concerned with money, space and resource limitations, so the choice of iSCSI 
versus AoE is
a big deal in getting the best bang for your infrastructure investment.
-- 
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson, omo sanza lettere                  Xenon AlphaPixel.com
PixelSense Landsat processing now available! http://www.alphapixel.com/demos/
"There is no Truth. There is only Perception. To Perceive is to Exist." - Xen
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |