| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
Hi,
Well : who fix the security problems from the 2.6.18 ? And it doesn't
boot at all on modern hardware.
Who use the dom0 kernel from lenny on production ? Me, at least on some
simple setup, and the pv_ops kernel on others setup.
If my actual pv_ops kernel is part of Squeeze, I really really be happy
to don't have to maintain it anymore.
The pv_ops dom0 kernel is the futur of Xen, so it's logic that Debian
choose it for his *future* version.
Olivier
On 18/03/2010 17:43, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Hi!
The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org is a rock solid.
I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don't pack the
Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org
for Squeeze dom0, if there are no stable options available out there.
What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system?
As the Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? No one
actually are using it!
I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some
distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am forced
to manually compile Xen and Linux from xen.org and all my problems go away as magic!
And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux
2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian
SHOULD only pack the sources from xen.org WITHOUT any significant
modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0.
Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why not
use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the
kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is
stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18!
Regards,
Thiago
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home