WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] slow dom0 write operations with 2.6.32 pv-ops and Xen4.0

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] slow dom0 write operations with 2.6.32 pv-ops and Xen4.0.0-rc4
From: Fantu <fantonifabio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:03:38 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100301120709.GQ29834@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100228230420.GP29834@xxxxxxx> <20100301074037.GJ2761@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100301120709.GQ29834@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
on one server with xen 4 from hg unstable, kernel pv_ops xen/stable and
performance of disk in dom0:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/vm/disks/xpt2.disk1.xm bs=1M count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 146,118 s, 71,8 MB/s


benco-2 wrote:
> 
>> You're measuring buffered (cached) performance, so when you limit
>> the amount of cache to 2 GB the performance will be slower.
>> 
>> Try adding "oflag=direct" do your dd commands and test again.
> 
> 
> oflag=direct option produce almost the same results on xen and non-xen
> systems:
> 
> #dd if=/dev/zero of=zerofile.tst bs=1k count=1000000 oflag=direct
> 1000000+0 records in
> 1000000+0 records out
> 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 616.219 s, 1.7 MB/s
> 
> what is interesting for me is the fact that with no cpu/memory limit and
> with
> caching the result is approx. 60% slowdown with xen kernel in comparison
> with non-xen kernel. Is it normal?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> roman
> 
> 
> <> 
>> -- Pasi
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   ,''`.       [benco] | mailto: benco@xxxxxxx | silc: /msg benco
>  : :' :  -------------------------------------------------------------
>  `. `'           GPG publickey: http://www.acid.sk/pubkey.asc
>    `-      KF  =  0DF6 0592 74D2 F17A DACF  A5C3 1720 CB7C F54C F429
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/slow-dom0-write-operations-with-2.6.32-pv-ops-and-Xen4.0.0-rc4-tp27738409p27781144.html
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users