[Xen-users] PF_RING + Xen

To:	ntop@xxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] PF_RING + Xen
From:	"Sergio Charpinel Jr." <sergiocharpinel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:20:27 -0300
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:21:08 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=++B+Z6ZCAXAPCheeAiU4LesmKqx964FSwf6XoSCX5uI=; b=yFrAh5oSt0oVHVIl9qZ1CRJrk62e4PO0vqO9LWUbfAcIme/a2cZH4GHlZKWLfaFxDk fa756+SU3ampO1BBEUQ61v5nqjykgwK3ODTu9rhgpU5BKoXCxStMcmaAqInx3ry4HDvx 60kqYAqYZmCRJvIGpmC6wkCD814jIjoJvAzGc=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZYzQDGPtGe/ytclKTwFMXbtGKf4t5yVasVxM58619NfwPj3qZAMoWw8j1MsCOYt3JZ OtMlwwpCOJFSLbpe07Yajr/ZDOJa+KbG+cMZNP/THGifev0GCr/pwmr1nFHs50NTioyU TBq9uNsWbWaUnBClK3Ve9mAkM7fCt2LkQo0FM=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

I'd like to know if there is someone using PF_RING + Xen guest or some
research in this regard.
How is the performance compared to a non-virtualized machine, what
configuration we could do to improve it, etc.

I'm planning to implement it, if we could not loose considerable perfomance.

Thanks

-- 
Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] PF_RING + Xen