WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS

To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS
From: Andy Pace <APace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:57:19 -0600
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:00:16 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AQHKo8QzLzwJUKgiHEaYRkXbWf3xkg==
Thread-topic: iSCSI vs NFS
Which is the easiest to manage with multiple (lets say hundreds) of xen VM's 
without sacrificing performance, and why?

What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems the way to 
go here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and die *NFS*, 
which I've had some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalability 
and performance...

Just thought i'd get an outside/un-biased (i hope!) opinion...
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>