|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0
Hi, Fajar
xen-3.1.0's network-bridge's copy did generate xenbr0 but no vif0.0
generated
at the same time.
Anyway, thanks for your explanation about the changes around bridge and vif
from xen-3.1.X to xen-3.4.X. It give me some clue to fix the problem I
call acrossed.
>>>> But in my xen-3.4.1 env, Dom0's bridge name is eth0, but it does NOT
>>>> attached to vif0.0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> correct. That's the new default setup.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> But the xentop also read NETTX and NETRX from vif , why not from eth0
>> bridge in xen-3.4.1?
>>
>
> Because eth0 in xen-3.4.x is not vif. It's a bridge. This is different
> from 3.1.x, where eth0 is basically vif0.0 that got renamed to eth0.
> And if what you wrote earlier is true, xentop only reads data from
> vif, not bridge.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX alway are 0, 明石 れい
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX alway are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX alway are 0, 明石 れい
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, 明石 れい
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, 明石 れい
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0,
明石 れい <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, 明石 れい
- Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 NETTX, NETRX always are 0, Fajar A. Nugraha
|
|
|
|
|