WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/nois

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:10:32 -0800
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:11:33 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BkNnkTAJAXNx/TgssmRtnLCX5RdiPap8FFzF+EyRDTg=; b=TDwGZESJnW0ErFgcGrcPdUpkr8Obh66lNzrpzTxShXeugcTJGE2Dck6rI09LvVS08O iSlRZXtT3/S21ec6QKj0HIK9OYAg7jq/HF+YLN2+3GCBt1Tub6dT2mZGTrXfbsIwOsd7 5dDLlgZIsq8UiROcJeFQ7DZYKlJjAKfkPJDm4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kiVMQa1mvVlMeLK+6+2mWZ/Ki+UHuevtkJbPqJe/qWmvxy/Im4csrn1CaJc8mxFPou GaQ9RZIyUeNrAZa/j6fSGRHwT5BWEx8qkePezM89x573cKZ2OB9AFkqhCz02MlwNgtpx v3AWfcRrj4YQv9L3QCMTovhWNNTEwVcLN82AE=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100113180859.GO25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c67eed301001121814s37bc44bftf8e4f9a4485f1015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113071325.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001130844p751c8cehd943b07729e08ebd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113171349.GJ25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131006i47a6889fyb3ba6419dad67116@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113180859.GO25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> What dom0 kernel you were running again? I can't remember anymore.

np.

it's distro-provided -- opensuse 11.2's,

 uname -a
 Linux test 2.6.31.8-0.1-xen #1 SMP 2009-12-15 23:55:40 +0100 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

 lsb_release -a
 LSB Version:
core-2.0-noarch:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.2-x86_64:core-4.0-x86_64:desktop-4.0-amd64:desktop-4.0-noarch:graphics-2.0-amd64:graphics-2.0-noarch:graphics-3.2-amd64:graphics-3.2-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch
 Distributor ID: SUSE LINUX
 Description:    openSUSE 11.2 (x86_64)
 Release:        11.2
 Codename:       n/a

 rpm -qa | grep -i ^xen-3
 xen-3.4.1_19718_04-28.1.x86_64

> Looks like it didn't like when cpus were removed on-the-fly.

which is fine, i suppose, as long as we can get it to stick at boot.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>