WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xenified linux kernel

To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xenified linux kernel
From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:19:06 +0000
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:19:54 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3QfK5lRhf214z+pPOWRrW9vrWms02YJ1v8v7eI9Q7LQ=; b=Rf99TyGW37VwF3t/7v0MEDQHcw7fWT+cBfja+P3QU0RP0BYfSmDsUoAKpP81TFgGJy kSjtpY9uO6bB1O8eH+4ITRw4DI7O3t6aQY+RyWc2JHZlaSk+w205DVYLMd5ggF7PNMQZ HZnGvnlhbyV29g/+2YqAO13bNjQifpJWr+3aA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pzl2GnVDEKNSQ1k+IBtkCk1RwAH1J/HieKg4UTOIP9PhnoKES/uyoHd2v9ov2D7q55 LV9oVG4o8HCgt7qhK22lK+/hxHjv0Wx7+SlWYNJfxJMX9s2Ur13J2ivaA/wQdO2ZtwwM gAqyOm6czLmSexW7FVoH3zmW0BRK6gewGwjFc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f4527be1001030732n7e80130dgeec2c7f1ceaf65fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8c911f391001030525n367b363ct7137581f8f6d29c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <673600.15617.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8c911f391001030545m304027b4k56453b32e0726710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <948029.24290.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <26259.90494.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be1001030732n7e80130dgeec2c7f1ceaf65fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> Oops !!
>> Not sure. Try to apply Andy's the most recent patches to 2.6.31.8 and build.
>>     http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
>> I tested patching per OpenSuse  only 2.6.31.8 64-bit kernel. No warranty for
>> 32-bit.
>>
>> Sorry.
>> Boris.
>
> Both 32 and 64 bit domU and dom0 have been well tested with
> xen-patches-2.6.31-9.tar.bz2 and seem to be very stable, but I've just
> uploaded xen-patches-2.6.31-10.tar.bz2 to
> http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list which has a
> couple of small fixes for suspend which had broken xen save/restore
> for pv domU's.

I've just noticed a problem with xen-patches-2.6.31-10.tar.bz2 and
have removed the download.

Sorry :(

Andy

>
> xen-patches-2.6.31-10.tar.bz2 is for 2.6.31.9 although they will
> probably also apply to .8
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 5:14:41 PM
>> Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Xenified linux kernel
>>
>> Yes, it works
>>
>> Boris.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 4:45:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: Xenified linux kernel
>>
>> Dear Boris:
>>
>> thanks for your prompt reply. do you think it is possible to apply
>> this instruction on the latest stable linux kernel .32?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Known bug for 32-bit. Workaround is on the net.
>>> http://mulps.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/compiling-xen-kernel-2-6-29-2/
>>>
>>> Boris
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 4:25:00 PM
>>> Subject: Xenified linux kernel
>>>
>>> Hi Dear:
>>>
>>> I am refering to the
>>>
>>> http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/building-xenified-2-6-30-1-kernel-via-xen-patches-2-6-30-2-tar-bz2/
>>> instruction to build an xenified linux kernel. I exactly follow the
>>> instructions but I've got the following errors:
>>>
>>>
>>>   LD      vmlinux.o
>>>   MODPOST vmlinux.o
>>> WARNING: modpost: Found 2 section mismatch(es).
>>> To see full details build your kernel with:
>>> 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
>>>   GEN    .version
>>>   CHK    include/linux/compile.h
>>>   UPD    include/linux/compile.h
>>>   CC      init/version.o
>>>   LD      init/built-in.o
>>>   LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
>>> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `timer_interrupt':
>>> /usr/src/build/linux-2.6.30.2/arch/x86/kernel/time_32-xen.c:463:
>>> undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>>> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Mehdi Sheikhalishahi
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Mehdi Sheikhalishahi
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users