|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] installing from sources and binary
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Tapas Mishra <tapas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is the difference in installing Xen from sources and installing from
> Binary
Pretty much the same answer for most source vs binary package.
For example, using third-party-provided packages:
- usually (though not always) created for a specific OS/version, so
that you'll have higher chance of getting it to work (more tested,
etc.)
- can be installed quickly
- can be uninstalled cleanly with little or no problems
- can save space, as you don't need to have some components needed to
compile the program.
using source:
- possible to use latest or development version (e.g. xen-unstable)
- more control. possible to include your own patch
A compromise between those two is to compile your own binary package.
Very useful if you have many servers with similar configurations (e.g.
when you're running your own datacenter/server farm).
What aspect are you most interested in?
--
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|