xen-users
[Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1)
With passive domains you cannot have detailed profiling
information on modules, only in kernel builtin functions and on Xen. All the
samples associated with modules will be grouped under the same symbol
"domain1-modules".
If you are interested in one particular module you
should try to recompile the kernel with the associated code builtin (or you can
use active domains, but follow the steps on the xenoprof tutorial to coordinate
opcontrol in dom0 and in the guest)
Renato
Renato,
I think I'm making progress. I followed your
suggestion of using --passive-domains and --passive-images. When I run
opreport, it is unable to find /domain1-modules and /domain1-xen-unknown.
Where or how do I specify the kernel modules I have running in domU/domain1? I
tried copying the *.ko files in /boot in dom0 and used --image-path=/boot in
opreport and it is still not finding them.
Thanks.
Dante
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Santos, Jose Renato G
<joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Try replacing "--active-domains=1" with
"--passive-domains=1 passive-images=<domU-kernel-image>" (use the
uncompressed version of your kernel image for the guest,
vmlinux-*)
To
use "active-domains" you need to run opcontrol in the guest in addition to
running it in dom0 and you need to coordinate the execution of both
instances.. This require the guest opcontrol to be ready before
running "opcontrol --start" in dom0. That is why it is failing. I suspect
you have not executed opcontrol in the
guest
Using active-domains is very tricky. I suggest that you use
--passive-domains, unless you really need active domains (it is only
useful in case you need detailed profiles for user processes running in the
guest)
Renato
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 6:13 PM
To: Santos, Jose Renato G
Cc:
Xen-users Subject: Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0
(status: -1)
Renato, I've narrowed down the opcontrol command
sequence that causes the "write error" I'm having. If I just run
"opcontrol --start" in dom0, it runs with no error and after "opcontrol
--shutdown" I can run "opreport" and get a real report. If I run
"opcontrol --start-daemon --active-domains=1" in dom0, run "opcontrol
--start" in domU (ID#1) and go back to dom0 and run "opcontrol --start" I
get the "write error" message. It's as if "--start-daemon" is grabbing the
file handle for /dev/oprofile/enable so when "--start" tries to write "1"
to /dev/oprofile/enable, it is unable to do so because it is already
locked. So I can run OProfile in normal (non-Xen) mode but as soon
I start using "--start-daemon" I have problems. To me it seems like a
Xenoprofile problem. I'm using OProfile 0.9.3 and
oprofile-0.9.3-xen-r2.patch applied successfully. Dante
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Santos, Jose Renato
G <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx> wrote:
What
version of OProfile are you using?
Renato
From: Dante Cinco [mailto:dantecinco@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday,
November 05, 2009 5:16 PM To: Santos, Jose Renato
G Cc: Xen-devel Subject: xenoprof: operation 9
failed for dom0 (status: -1)
Renato, When I tried running "opcontrol --start"
(after previously running "opcontrol --start-daemon") in dom0, I get
this error message: /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1639: echo:
write error: Operation not permitted and this message in the
Xen console: (XEN) xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom 0
(status : -1) It looks like opcontrol is trying to do this:
echo 1 > /dev/oprofile/enable and it is failing. "operation
9" maps to XENOPROF_start which is consistent with running "opcontrol
--start." At first, I ignored the error because it gave the indication
"Profiler running" but after I ran "opcontrol --shutdown" followed by
"opreport" in dom0, I got this error message: error: no sample
files found: profile specification too strict ? Do you know why
the write error is occurring? I followed the steps in
xenoprof_tutorial.ppt. Dante
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1),
Santos, Jose Renato G <=
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
- [Xen-users] Re: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Dante Cinco
- [Xen-users] RE: xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom0 (status: -1), Santos, Jose Renato G
|
|
|