Re: [Xen-users] LVM+Xen+FreeNAS possible?

To:	John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] LVM+Xen+FreeNAS possible?
From:	rajan chandi <chandi.rajan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:58:21 +0530
Cc:	"Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:29:04 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h5xlQ4rc2Cua+at8TZG4utCQ9VK5MfLsNT1WQAOF+c4=; b=bWVrE84XdbBXQB8mO+J3gEYXupGykxLGbMSD/Fku1R82UreLEcoAYXJhtrIQlFPMOo 4vVOzqlY6Kgio5JDlfmShuNiNIIgnlIRgrRhRHDJm2q3HxCKUkiJ3gt8z9+fjn5sG7WC JPWF+KXUvbmdqZvWlNSvoLRgoHnFD7FzDrOHs=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=g7Or8g+UkQU1oFmVEeyiWhsnsiQbV+NqkWu10iwvbq0gtg2DIBqnNH/t+5II+sW+cJ KufAK1cJ1+XFYcgwWbMZ7AY3YkEdg0bIcHyyAmrFZR3L0+0FrBWoelXJRhxwC5H4RmF7 JEn5zyBzSRRTGRzudapqdwyqSuzR0QQXvUYH0=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4AE84D7B.70601@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<a70bf0e20910270303x4448021cn3380ecc7e9a34646@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0910272310q47eb9f09i44795ff62550d34e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a70bf0e20910272323v4f1625f0j43ff6730aa077232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0910272335l59409d1j2be123600106643b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a70bf0e20910280009o7fe7aecatc297840dd2fd15af@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE84D7B.70601@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

John,

Thanks for the information.

I just checked their site.
GlusterFS sounds more like enterprise solution than a web 2.0 solution.

We are building a SAAS based web utility hireplug.com (not live yet!) which will help connect recruiters world-wide and exchange resumes etc.

LiveJournal.com(Alexa #76) also uses MogileFS.

Regards
Rajan

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:26 PM, John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

MogileFS will replicate the files across these drives. So, RAIDs are not needed.
We are not intending to update the files at all. So, don't need POSIX compliance.

There exist MogileFS-Clients for Java/Ruby and we are going to use that one.

If you like the looks of MogileFS, I recommend having a look at GlusterFS. Gluster is more of a real filesystem (POSIX and such) but does the some replication and auto-consistency things that may be of interest. It's then all exposed to clients via FUSE, no special APIs required.

John

--
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] LVM+Xen+FreeNAS possible?