| 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] working with latest -xen kernel?
 
Hi,  Boris! i have installed and run virt-manager successfully. After i boot into my xen paravirt kernel I got, [root@Server1-FC11 init.d]# xm info host                   : Server1-FC11 release                : 2.6.30-rc6-tip version                : #1 SMP Thu Oct 22 12:48:59 PKST 2009 machine                : x86_64 nr_cpus                :
 8 nr_nodes               : 1 cores_per_socket       : 4 threads_per_core       : 1 cpu_mhz                : 1995 hw_caps                : bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000140:000ce33d:00000000:00000001:00000000 virt_caps              : hvm total_memory           : 8186 free_memory            : 131 node_to_cpu            : node0:0-7 node_to_memory         :
 node0:131 xen_major              : 3 xen_minor              : 4 xen_extra              : .1 xen_caps               : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64  xen_scheduler          : credit xen_pagesize           : 4096 platform_params        : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset          : unavailable cc_compiler            : gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC)
  cc_compile_by          : root cc_compile_domain      : (none) cc_compile_date        : Wed Oct 21 16:54:50 PKST 2009 xend_config_format     : 4 [root@Server1-FC11 init.d]# xm list Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s) Domain-0                                     0  7948    
 8     r-----  11313.5 [root@Server1-FC11 init.d]# ifconfig eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:4F:3A:72:B1             inet addr:10.11.21.31  Bcast:10.11.21.255  Mask:255.255.254.0           inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4fff:fe3a:72b1/64 Scope:Link           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1           RX packets:772889 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0           TX packets:384416 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
            RX bytes:1109703046 (1.0 GiB)  TX bytes:38290313 (36.5 MiB)
  lo        Link encap:Local Loopback             inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1           RX packets:54105050 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0           TX packets:54105050 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0            RX bytes:651622265675 (606.8 GiB)  TX bytes:651622265675 (606.8
 GiB)
  peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:4F:3A:72:B1             inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4fff:fe3a:72b1/64 Scope:Link           UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1           RX packets:773940 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0           TX packets:387413 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000            RX bytes:1123688923 (1.0 GiB)  TX bytes:40033135 (38.1 MiB)           Interrupt:16 Memory:d6000000-d6012700 
  virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:92:5A:81:A9:CD 
            inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0           TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0            RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:3463 (3.3 KiB) [root@Server1-FC11 init.d]# brctl show bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled    interfaces eth0       
 8000.001e4f3a72b1    yes        peth0 pan0        8000.000000000000    no         Now I want to install paravirt xen guests. PFA, different screen shots of virt-manager while creating a VM. But the paravirt option is disabled and i am unable to select  it. Why is that so?
  Regards, Fasiha Ashraf
  --- On Fri, 16/10/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] working with latest -xen kernel? To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, "Fasiha Ashraf" <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc:
 xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Friday, 16 October, 2009, 11:24 PM
 
 Did you also read his update on that post, linking to http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ ? > Yes
I did, but i have a question about it as well, Since i have compiled
xen with this kernel >version, Do i need to install it from rpm as well?
  YES
  # cd xen-3.4.1 # make uninstall # rpm -iv xen-3.4.1-4.src.rpm # cd rpmbuild/SPEC # rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec . . . . . . . . 
  > or just i should skip that step and start installing libvirt?
  NO
  When xen 3.4.1 and tools  are installed via generated rpms proceed with libvirt install as suggested.
  >  Also tell
me should it be done from my dom0 or from the base kernel(nonexen)? From base kernel environment.
  Then install pvops ( or xenified kernel) , create grub entry and reboot. Currently , 2.6.31.4 (pvops) is running in Dom0 on top of F11 in my environment. Random xend crashes take place, service xend start to recover.
  Boris.
  --- On Fri, 10/16/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] working with latest -xen kernel? To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Friday, October 16, 2009, 3:33 AM
 
 On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, >
I have noticed that you have build
xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11. Please help
in creating VMs it this case. my virt-manager and virt-install are not
working. and I am following this link to create xen DomUs http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/#comment-618
  Did you also read his update on that post, linking to http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ ? Yes I did, but i have a question about it as well, Since i have compiled xen with this kernel version, Do i need to install it from rpm as well? or just i should skip that step and start installing
 libvirt?Also tell me should it be
 done from my dom0 or from the base kernel(nonexen)?
  > > this error while running #vncviewer localhost:0 > > Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd. > Copyright (C) 2000-2006 TightVNC Group > Copyright (C) 2004-2009 Peter Astrand for Cendio AB > See http://www.tigervnc.org for information on TigerVNC. > vncviewer: unable to open display “”
  I'd start with running "xm list" and see if your domU is actually running or not. After that, do something like I am getting dom0 with running status [root@Server1-FC11 xendoms]# xm list  Name                                       
 ID  
 Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s) Domain-0                                     0  7077     8     r-----     64.9 F11-G1S1                                     1   500     1     -b----      1.1 F11-G2S1                                    
 2   500     1     -b----      1.1
  netstat -anp | egrep "(:59)(.+)(LISTEN)" [root@Server1-FC11 xendoms]# netstat -anp | egrep "(:59)(.+)(LISTEN)" tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:5900              0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN      2490/qemu-dm         tcp        0     
 0 127.0.0.1:5901              0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN      2623/qemu-dm        
  to see if there's any process listening on port 5900+. If a domU was started and it has a vnc GUI, there should be some qemu-dm process shown there.
  > > Also i have some confusion about disk specs what i use are: > disk = [ 'phy:/dev/loop0,xvda,w' ] > Cause i am not using lvm. Here is my
  Where does loop0 come from? If you're using disk/partition as domU storage you can simply specify the block device (e.g. /dev/sdb, /dev/sda4, etc.). If you're using file you can directly use tap:aio. [root@Server1-FC11 xendoms]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 438.4 GB, 438489317376 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 53309 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000080
     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1               1          13      104391   83  Linux /dev/sda2              14        2180    17406427+  82  Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda3            2181       42776   326087370   83  Linux /dev/sda4           42777       53309    84606322+   5  Extended /dev/sda5   *       42777       53309    84606291   83  Linux
  > > my disk specs are right or not? Any suggestions??
  I'm guessing you specified the wrong disk and domU didn't start at all. I am not using LVM partitions. when i specified one dom disk as /dev/sda i have nothing for next dom. In such situation is it good to use file? like u suggest. --  Fajar
  _______________________________________________ Xen-users
 mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |   
      
  Yahoo! India has a new look.   Take a sneak peek.  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
 
 
  |   
       -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
 
 
  |  
  
        Yahoo! India has a new look.  Take a sneak peek._______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |   
 
 | 
    |