WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] rebased opensuse 2.6.31 xen patches

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] rebased opensuse 2.6.31 xen patches
From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:56:51 +0100
Cc: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:57:46 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WbHfHYQEFey9t8oKP0NP90wowj6BuFugufiQzKJ2wqM=; b=LNvDqCRxrrr6Zf0LfyQ5n5vib4F7s6TjGoqnv3tMv4mwqB+CaVaRtc+7cntu3mySwm qwHCuShFMhCprO0TCdcim2saKNsxy9KZHFD1jXd8u2/uQmFx3UZ7QjLDpewhgluUbNuE mctKBnLB0eQ1gK2pD+ZeDeYFTa2lU8rPiEgoc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=arOkchhhDWd+0Whp9JzZlxE9tZopFRSTiIsXzh/2/nArUd7FIQak46a1ODxc4CajiG du8s3LmWhabtpRt07WA89ov0EqMwn/Xdx6EihAdMmNjPKgsMKm/BDIYT0DMcfM7+Y0Ua NNDV+7MEaVGtnIwNTHz6hK9OQxuEejfC2Ztp0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AD6FA3D020000780001A0A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f4527be0910140836n773edebdt111533bc415602a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45c43ef50910141115i6cbe838as6d7b57ec0138cc0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0910150122q748eecb7v88960abde67e36b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD6FA3D020000780001A0A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> 15.10.09 10:22 >>>
>>Thanks Bruce, I've CC'ed Jan in case he wants to merge this fix into his tree.
>
> No, I won't - this is due to you dropping all our other patches (in the given
> case, the reason why this works for us is patches.fixes/use-totalram_pages.
>
> If you drop all our non-Xen patches, you generally will want to also drop
> all of patches.xen/xen3-* except for the ones stating "Automatically
> created from "patches.kernel.org/*" by xen-port-patches.py", otherwise
> you will always have the risk of those depending on something the
> respective native patch introduced.
>
> Jan
>
>

Sorry Jan, I have a script that filters the xen patches exactly as you
describe but I had made a small mistake which allowed
xen3-use-totalram_pages.patch to slip through.

Will be more careful in future.

Andy

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users