Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen

To:	Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen
From:	Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:52:36 +0530 (IST)
Cc:	"Fajar A." <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:23:27 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1254813756; bh=OCSJo5Ptktn3vSBYNuZ99vtpC4B+zCwplFtfs79z54g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VNgHd/7lJSLstzWjqMqSj6Lu5gOCS7U1KrVNKnty/vbRIujZg5SdOMG/AkvyszQt5naLTx9dwjPMu59StoZCckyjjxkhtPMAuCn8rkdCTBnRYUGnfpjB+YDTW17pspqH2aHq9OHtAxe7sbBWA2VxQf1vJabJUIupNHiiRbGauVg=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jdrq3bWrC8kVwZsF/wn4pg9vTcPXiM7f4rY7ZVPPboEpX9dNvdYrfU0ASdwZXnG4zK/zU3dpRDADKpIMOfRFxj9V9D+oo6Be8e8BSH2Cmb1nT8gd4gukXPGXE3gP2tdfwEls5qjCzPhgNiVNXxcs1/vu/eRUOMciPa9NecCfOko=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<f9611b0f0909292340o6a53326aobcd87334d7cfaa6b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Is this guest to guest throuput issue resolved?
What is affecting guest to guest throughput? Since I have timer frequency 1000Hz and high resolution timer both enabled in my dom0. Also i am using cpu cores pinned for each VM an Dom0. Please guide me some more about getting increased throughput between guests.

Regards,
Fasiha Ashraf

--- On Wed, 30/9/09, Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Fajar A." <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, "Fasiha Ashraf" <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, 30 September, 2009, 11:40 AM

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:33:19AM +0200, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
>> I experienced the same problem with netperf and with hping also. In
>> general every tool that sends packet at fixed rates seems to suffer this
>> problem. If you use the flood option ( sends packets as fast as possible -
>> for example 'ping -f' or 'hping3 -f') instead of a fixed rate the rate
>> become much higher. What I discovered is this issue should be related to
>> Xen's signal handling/delivery.
>> Netperf use setitimer() to send packets at fixed rate. In my experience on
>> dom0/U, with no load, Xen cannot go over 250 signals per second. Because
>> netperf use signal wakeup the function that send packets I think your
>> problem can be related to this issue. If you want to be sure, count the
>> average number of packet per seconds. It should be about 250 packets/s
>> (not more).
>
>
> 250 per second.. sounds like kernel HZ value?

Yes, infact I'm going to test it with 1000Khz. Stay tuned.

:)

m-

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Keep up with people you care about with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen