|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-
Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?
When I check the guest OS
[root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table [root@localhost ~]#
Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-,
fmb fmb <=
|
|
|
|
|