WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-
From: fmb fmb <feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:48:13 +0300
Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:48:59 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=N7zV9d6V3HgovIWEfQdNNJoOBAeSqY3L0VcnF11WoPw=; b=bj8eNZUM03+tuJ7QsZFiVBTKtT32r2WeT2RvZKcejHuSUSB2x66H+M/KpFsRQMt3BZ kAyb1qtHG+PtA4Kf/0tkVeVRVVG41cHeFXFE6MNtW1SjPEMEHe5hE3YFF3S+qDe0sDJT eGpvH1SABnLdETPDd5JXci7jGDbqhbQYNewqY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PEU9h7HCqAZKblVD8UJBWDLd5aa2gPNcRBgZCWDfNKX/FF4E777YK8n9qfV9gqLwMn Ne7m4O0tvEKt8sFzKyD6jJ5cPB8onbZ6uaTQn7YTggwEHVgMiZPrHP689U6S4pBQpSOT 9ZoPmiSuNCeG/iBLUmtBfepKrE2vCh9scg3gE=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?

When I check the guest OS

[root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table

Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table
[root@localhost ~]#

Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>