|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-
 
Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?
  When I check the guest OS
  [root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l
  Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders 
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
  Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table
  Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes 
 Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table [root@localhost ~]# 
  Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?
  
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-,
fmb fmb <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |