|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
admin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> That's clear.
>
> But now we know that someone is working on it. It's a good starting
> point, right?
WHERE exactly do you read this? The only thing that I saw in this post
was that they are going to talk about it:
> "How they tend to resolve this issue and what is their goal (making it
> opensource or put someone in place of Ligesh and continue the company)
> is unknown as of yet.
The only thing we know is that we don't know anything yet! The rest is
pure assumptions.
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Nathan Eisenberg
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Rudi Ahlers
- Re: SV: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Thomas Goirand
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Nathan Stratton
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Admin GG
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Thomas Goirand
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, admin@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM,
Thomas Goirand <=
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, admin@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Xen-users] HyperVM, Luke S Crawford
[Xen-users] hypervm, mattias
[Xen-users] hypervm, mattias
|
|
|
|
|