| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen is a feature
|
To: |
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen is a feature |
|
From: |
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:32 +0530 |
|
Cc: |
npiggin@xxxxxxx, ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxx, stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx, George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 29 May 2009 08:47:36 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<20090528.210559.137121893.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<162f4c90-6431-4a2a-b337-6d7451d7b11e@default> <20090528001350.GD26820@xxxxxxx> <4A1F302E.8030501@xxxxxxxx> <20090528.210559.137121893.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:45:34 -0700
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> Xen changes - especially dom0 - are overwhelmingly not about improving
> >> Linux, but about having some special hook and extra treatment in
> >> random places - and that's really bad.
> >>
> >
> > You've made this argument a few times now, and I take exception to it.
> >
> > It seems to be predicated on the idea that Xen has some kind of niche
> > usage, with barely more users than Voyager. Or that it is a parasite
> > sitting on the side of Linux, being a pure drain.
>
> I don't see Ingo's comments, whether I agree with them or not, as
> an implication of Xen being niche. Rather I see his comments as
> an opposition to how Xen is implemented.
>
You can see Ingo's comments and whole thread under subject :
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/27/758
--
JSR
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home