|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Second ETH? 
| 2009/5/18 Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
It shouldn't need the external router - the guests are on the same subnet, so the packet should simply get forwarded to the right interface by the bridge code on the Dom0Admin GG wrote: 
And, now, if i have 2 xen VM on same host, one with the ip 192.168.1.2 and one with the 192.168.1.4, if i from .4 try to ping .2 i reach it trough .1, the gateway.
 Well, ok. Right. As VMs are on the same subnet, packages go straight  to the right VM.
 
 And, now i know how can i comunicate between 2 VM on the same host. Now remains the problem: if i have 2 hosts? I've searched in the archive, and i haven't found anything with keys you gave me. I'll look topic by topic tonight.
 
 What about "Now, my problem is: i have to mount a remote volume via NFS. Do you
think it's better mounting it on host then creating a virtual hd in it
or mounting it directy in the VM?"?
 
 Thankyou
 
 Giorgio
 
 
That's the default.
Can i enable direct routing between VMs on the same host?
 
_______________________________________________
--  
Simon Hobson
 
Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/  for books by acclaimed 
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as 
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
 Xen-users mailing list
 Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |