|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] very interesting Xen Disk I/O performance
Hi all,
I tested the xen vm disk I/O this weekend and had some interesting observations:
I ran TPC-C benchmarks (mostly random small disk read) within two VMs (PV) with the exactly the same resource and software configuration. I started the benchmarks in the two VMs at the same time (started with a script, the time difference is within several ms). The Xen VM scheduler seems always favor one VM, which results in a 50% better performance over the other VM. I changed the seqence of the VM creation and application starting order, the specific VM always got better performance, 30%-50% better.
What could be the reason that xen always favor a specific VM?
I ran the above test for several more times. Between each run, I purged the cached data within each VM to make the I/O demand always the same. It is interesting that the performance gap between the two VM becomes smaller and smaller. After 6 runs, the performance almost the same.
Anyone has any idea? Does the VM scheduler scheduling VMs based on history?
I am using Xen 3.3.1, CentOS 5.1, linux 2.8.18-x86_64 Each VM has 512M, 2-VCPU not pinned. Dom0 with 512M, not pinned. Host: dell poweredge 1950: 8G, two quad-core Intel xeon.
Thanks in advance, Jia.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-users] very interesting Xen Disk I/O performance,
Jia Rao <=
|
|
|
|
|