| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Performance difference between a "partition image file"
Hi Kevin
I do not have numbers, but the partition based option should have a
better performance.
You can try yourself that, running a benchmark like bonnie++ inside your
image file domU as well as inside your partition based domU.
Then, you will have numbers to share with us ;-)
Cheers,
N
Kevin McKeon wrote:
Does anyone know how significant the performance hit is when using a
partition image file for the file system of a domU instance as opposed
to using a file system on a separate disk?
For example:
disk =['tap:aio:/xen/images/mydomU_partition.img,xvda1,w']
*vs*
disk =['phy:hda1,xvda1,w']
I realize the second config would be faster, but will the first one
work pretty well? Does anyone know of any performance papers written
on this subject?
Cheers,
Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--
==============================================
Nuno Ricardo Santos Loureiro da Silva Ferreira
NMR Spectroscopy Research Group
Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research
Utrecht University
Bloembergen gebouw
Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31.(0)30.253 9932
F: +31.(0)30.253 2652
E: n.l.ferreira@xxxxx
W: http://nmr.chem.uu.nl
==============================================
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home