Thanks again, it's production, but fortunately, the clients is my family ;o).
It's
a home server. I will simply try, but I wait for 3.4 to release. It makes me
feel
more safe...
BR,
Carsten.
----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Fre, 27.3.2009 09:56
An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> ; xen-users
<xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: RE: Another question about msi.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2009年3月27日 16:53
>To: Jiang, Yunhong; xen-users
>Subject: AW: Another question about msi.
>
>Thanks, so I will give it a try.
>
>In fact I never found someting in docs that say: don't use
>shared-interrupt devices
>in different domains. But you will find some hints in the
>internet not to do so.
Yes, shared interrupt is much more complex, and may impact performance or even
cause trouble sometimes, especially in some corner case. So if in a production
environemnt, it is not a good idea to use it, I think.
>
>I remeber something line an issue when shutting down a DomU
>that includes one device,
>that the other device doesn't work any longer, as the GSI is
>disabled in Dom0. Might
>be a bug. I never understand why it shouldn't work, as I think
>the transfer from IRQ
>to event channel is done somewhere in Xen or Dom0.
Shared interrupt is quite tricky.
>
>My hope was that MSI will be much clearer, allowing me to use
>the PCI slot, whilst
>the NICs are using MSI. Would be nice to put in another NIC or
>TV or Fax or ...
>
>BR,
>Carsten.
>
>----- Originalnachricht -----
>Von: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>Gesendet: Fre, 27.3.2009 02:21
>An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> ; xen-users
><xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Betreff: RE: Another question about msi.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2009年3月27日 4:40
>>To: xen-users
>>Cc: Jiang, Yunhong
>>Subject: Another question about msi.
>>
>>Antoher question regarding MSI support.
>>
>>When I have a motherboard where two PCIe slots and one PCI
>>slot share an
>>interrupt when using current
>>Xen and kernel with GSI, when I now use Xen 3.4-unstable and latest
>>kernel, it will use the MSI (as the
>>Two PCIe slots are occupied by realtek NICs and their modules are MSI
>>aware). Two different MSI show up
>>in /proc/interrupts.
>>
>>Does this now mean that I can pass-through the PCI slot into a
>>pv DomU,
>>because the GSI is now exclusively
>>used by the PCI slot (what I could not do before, as NICs shared GSI
>>with the network cards)?
>
>I suspect even shared-interrupt devices can be assigned to
>different guest.
>
>BTW, if a device can be assigned to a guest are determined by
>many factor, like FLR support etc (at least for HVM domain).
>
>>
>>For your Info: Xen 3.3.1 and latest kernel will not work for me.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Carsten.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home