WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Host and guest architecture compatibility

To: "Ferreira, N.L." <N.L.Ferreira@xxxxx>, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Host and guest architecture compatibility
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:08 +1100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:59:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BF939566B5E30A428D214588D196C520903D6C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BF939566B5E30A428D214588D196C520903D6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><7207d96f0903212028qa524ecbhf8dda8b48eb4a815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BF939566B5E30A428D214588D196C520903D6C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcmqnkwYY4OLyZCHQ8+bTcYVLUNyygAN7yj3AAOsfDA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Host and guest architecture compatibility
> 
> Hi Fajar,
> 
> I *must* work with the latest version of SL 4.x (presently 4.7), I
> cannot avoid it. This is due to grid middleware requisites and
> technical support, otherwise I'm on my own to put grid services
> working.
> 
> So if I understood correctly from your post, a i386 domU running one
of
> the latest RHEL like kernels, works fine on top of a x86_64 dom0.
Thus,
> SL47 i386 domU will not probably run !!
> 
> Since I'm not at all proficient on kernel business, in order to avoid
> further problems probably I should stick to a i386 dom0.

The backend and frontend structures are incompatible between 32 and 64
bit modes for block devices (eg disk). Later versions of xen (3.1?)
publish a variable in xenstore to work out what mode structures to use
and they use that version of the structure to communicate with.

I know this because I had to fudge a workaround in gplpv :)

> 
> My idea was to have these new servers running x86_64 on dom0, in case
> I'll need it in the future.
> 

I think you can use a 32 bit Dom0 on a 64 bit hypervisor without any
problems, which pretty much gives you the best of both worlds.

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>