WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.28.7 domU oops: invalid opcode 0000

To: Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.28.7 domU oops: invalid opcode 0000
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:28:35 +0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:29:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49B8EA46.7020609@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <gp9g4o$jn8$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0903112241l4de6fc5csef2a93d1bc74db21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B8EA46.7020609@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is it x86 or x86_64 domU kernel? Do you have NX disabled in your BIOS?
>
> I don't know. But the bug is fixed in 2.6.29-rc7.

Glad to hear it then.
I was thinking you probably got the same problem I did, using 64bit
domU kernel on a machine with NX disabled. On that particular case
enabling NX fixed the problem.

>
> Also see Jeremy's post on the devel list.
>

I'm not subscribed to that list :)

Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>