WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] scp performance from machine to guest

To: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] scp performance from machine to guest
From: Zach Moazeni <zach.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:46:19 -0500
Cc: xen-users list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:45:54 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:in-reply-to:subject :references:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; bh=pWknts1uhCldlVgvtNAwCxYYjujb10KCysDBEs7fnz0=; b=Ww6GOckmpV9V0dOJ12YX7OW6+zCBPPXKAPeLlLXe/UGV1uedHCjSbaLyCfmy8WNfjm PbZLgVQMxr3eMkeQLFM5ERmO4+B9nLRJfx1G8TEDmnANXjQDejWwUyHG9X02gQyNa7bh M+DSGCxJu9ZGn7RaBjeMzdWgRm7unC7Qjx2HE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:references:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=GdHqUynUksjLbQ2ee45ajRm1xk6Yn9vSckM183/bEd5v58bmdbFoPnBlRGWa++NwW6 C1GcYE3BYXspMzVz4G5UhFBkYdPCBUrduI5g8BV1KLZc0h0Xp61rI9nBUVdlWfBg+/jx Fqi7DIpU+mZNWoAsFI0u6KnT+hvkYOUaxvJ2s=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70903021236h783cc223m8342018ae53b2d17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <46374090-0C24-45B6-A7F5-12CBE83028A3@xxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70903021236h783cc223m8342018ae53b2d17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Javier Guerra wrote:

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Zach Moazeni <zach.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you guys lend any insight to this?

resource contention is far more a limiting factor than bandwidth in Xen.

IOW: both Dom0 and DomU were fighting for some resource, either drive
heads or (more likely) CPU time.

Ahh interesting. I didn't think of that.

Thanks for the quick response Javier!

-Zach

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>